|
number1gq
|
read my profile
sign my guestbook
Interests: Making money and meeting new interesting people. Writing, talking, fool, basketball, playin games, computers, dancing, snorkeling, the outdoors, and just having fun.
Occupation: Marketing
Industry: Media
Message: message me
Member Since:
12/1/2005
|
|
|
Women
are very cognitive in the way they analyze every situation; especially
first encounters with guys. For the majority of men out there, the
first encounter is a hurdle very few from them can overcome and if they
do, they find themselves in uncharted waters and usually end up
crashing and burning. But why is this? Why is it that when you feel,
you’re doing the right thing, by showing a woman respect, showering her
with confidence and literally kissing her ass…..you still leave with
your tail between your legs? It’s simple, ATTRACTION IS SELFISH! It
doesn’t care how nice of a guy you are. It is an evolved response by
our natural instincts to select the mate with the best possible genes
to transfer to our offspring. To women this is second nature as they do
it all the time, pick choose and refuse while men are stuck doing the
chasing.
.....to be continued
| | |
| First there were reports of abuse at Abu Ghraib, murder at Bagram Air Base and vicious torture at Guantanamo Bay. Now come reports of ritualistic abuse of troops and random shootings of Iraqi civilians.
(It's the 3rd article down on the Sunday, November 27th page. The dates
can be navigated on the calender on the righthand side of the page,
about midway down)
Is this behavior a product of a demoralized youth brought up on Mortal Kombat and Grand Theft Auto?
Is it the product of a government engineering a culture of torture in the military to enstill fear into the masses?
Is it the product of a news media focusing on what has always been present, just concealed?
Or
is it a product of all of these things; an establishment creating a
culture of abusive opression and focused on by their media affiliates in order to desensitize us to what is our future not only abroad but here at home?
Torture Proponent, Josef Stalin
From the section "Motivation to torture" in Wikipedia..
It
was long thought that "good" people would not torture and only "bad"
ones would, under normal circumstances. Research over the past 50 years
suggests a disquieting alternative view, that under the right
circumstances and with the appropriate encouragement and setting, most
people can be encouraged to actively torture others. Stages of torture
mentality include:
-Reluctant or peripheral participation
-Official
encouragement: As the Stanford prison experiment and Milgram experiment
show, many people will follow the direction of an authority figure
(such as a superior officer) in an official setting (especially if
presented as a compulsory obligation), even if they have personal
uncertainty. The main motivations for this appear to be fear of loss of
status or respect, and the desire to be seen as a "good citizen" or
"good subordinate".
-Peer encouragement: to accept torture as
necessary, acceptable or deserved, or to comply from a wish to not
reject peer group beliefs. At worst this leads to competition between
torturers to produce more pain or harsher results.
-Dehumanization:
seeing victims as objects of curiosity and experimentation, where pain
becomes just another test to see how it affects the victim.
-Disinhibition:
socio-cultural and situational pressures may cause torturers to undergo
a lessening of moral inhibitions and as a result act in ways not
normally countenanced by law, custom and conscience.
-Organisationally,
like many other procedures, once torture becomes established as part of
internally acceptable norms under certain circumstances, its use often
becomes institutionalised and self-perpetuating over time, as what was
once used exceptionally for perceived necessity finds more reasons
claimed to justify wider use.
| | |
| Would you believe it if you were told that the presidency of the United
States is not the most powerful position in the US Government, much
less the world, and that non elected members of a social engineering
group have been dictating every major aspect of the US political agenda
domestically and abroad for decades, in order to eventually corral the
United States into a one world government? Consider the following.
Curtis
Dall, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's son-in-law, wrote in his
1967 book "My Exploited Father-in-Law", "For a long time I felt that
FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit
this country, the USA. But he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his
political 'ammunition,' as it were, was carefully manufactured for him
in advance by the CFR-One World Money Group."
In 1966, Carroll Quigley, a CFR member and former professor of Bill Clinton's at Georgetown University, wrote "Tragedy and Hope",
in which he declared that the CFR, as it was rumored, did in fact have
a secret plan to form a one world socialist government and that he
could now safely reveal the plot, since their agenda at the time, had
been sufficiently entreched to the extent that any attempt to uproot it
would be futile. I wouldn't suggest you fund their agenda by purchasing
the book. If you cannot find it at the library, I highly suggest
reading The Naked Capitalist, by Cleon Skousen.
During
the 1980 republican national convention, Ronald Reagan villified
president Jimmy Carter for his association with the CFR(Council on
Foreign Relations), but then went on to make George Herbert Walker Bush
his vice-presidential running mate, despite his allged misgivings for him. George Herbert Walker Bush brought with him into Reagan's cabinet, 18 CFR members, 10 Trilateral Commission members, and 10 Bilderberg Group members, all institutions dedicated to building a socialist world government.
Brian
Quig wrote in 1991: Goldwater's Administrative Director Tom Dunlevy...
was an insider at the [1980 GOP] convention... I will always remember
the very words of Tom Dunlevy following my protest of the selection of
George Bush for VP. They were etched into my mind. "We didn't like that
either. It was a deal with the Devil. Henry Kissinger and Gerald Ford,
present at the convention as agents of David Rockefeller, assured
Reagan the presidency if he accepted Bush on the ticket. Otherwise
Rockefeller would swing the election to Carter."
Cleon Skousen
spoke with Reagan at the convention, both before and after the Bush
decision, and related how Reagan told how Kissinger and Ford with the
support of Walter Cronkite coerced him. According to Skousen these are
Reagan's very words "They showed me the brush by which I would be
tarred if I did not go along." After the election, when George Bush's
top man, campaign manager James Baker, became Reagan's chief of staff
-- the one person who controlled who saw the president -- the betrayal
of conservatism was complete.
And 24 years later, in 2004, we had an election in which both candidates, George Bush and John Kerry, are controlled by the CFR!
Now that you know who really runs the world, would you be surprised to learn that the very same people control virtually the entire media establishment? | | |
| It is said that 75%
of all language is not what you say but how you say it. So simply put
when you don't say thing you are in fact saying just about everything.
One thing we should realize men is that women pay special attention to
body language due to their cognitve nature, and she is able to read ur
sutple signs 10 times better than you. To women communication is key
and when you can master this, she becomes more respnosive to you.
You ever wonder why some
guys got all the chicks while you were working on you pickup lines in
high school? Quite simple they had control of their Body languge and
let's not mention the one's that drive the female labido like Fabio or
Bond, who personified confidence and sex appeal. On another note, the
male knight bird is a master at seduction and performs a beautfiul
dance to woo females birds into mating and the bird with the best dance
wins. You see body language is the key to everything because it can
openly show a person's intentions and character.
From the body language,
you can tell how confident, sexual, open or even shy a sperson is by
reading these signals. In addition, many of us dig ourselves holes by
sending out the wrong signals thus we end up screwing ourselves over.
However, if you learn to master sending out the right signals you build
put urself on a higher plane and thus would have to really wanna screw
up to do so.
Sadly, most men are so
stubborn and so full of pride that they think what they do is fine and
don't need to learn something new. What you must realize men is that
you can control your body langauge and make yourself more attractive to
the women you want by being more diverse instead of static and
monochrome.
You must realize that in
life nothing ever remains the same and gents being totally in the dark
and being stubborn are what kills most of us. Yeah everyone says
ignorance is bliss until they strike out and walk away defeated with
their tails between their legs.
So how does this stuff works you ask?
Well you can start by the
confidence you exude as you walk or talk to someone. In addition, avoid
fondling your shirt or tie when you talk to her because she will be
juding your every move. Learn to avoid jerky motions and high pitched,
fast paced speech, it only shines light on your insecurities.
Furthermore, always try to make and maintain eye contact and for
goodness sakes, don't drop it before she does otherwise you relinquish
control to her.
Another thing that builds
attraction and seduction with women is how detached you can make
yourself appear to be. For instance when talking to her, be confident
and direct your body in such a way that it seems as though you're
interested, yet not too consumed by her presence. This actually gets
the testosterone flowing in her and she then starts working for your
attention.
If you don't think this
works, try it yourself and you'll be astonished by the results. Watch
the guys who are masters at getting the girls and see what they
do. Take note of the body lanauge they exhibit and see how the women
respond. Yeah there's a great chance you won't get the first time, hell
maybe not even the second time but practice makes perfect so get to
work.
| | |
| Fellas no matter how
macho you think you are, there are many women who still continue to go
unsatisfied and why is this. Well it's quite simple, build anticipation
and you shall build pleasure. We are visually stimulated and can catch
wood at the sight of her but with her it's a lot different, she has to
condition her mind to want it.
Firstly guys, learn to do
without sometime and one thing DON'T EVER, EVER BEG YOUR WOMAN FOR SEX!
That turns her off and she then starts to see sex as chore and then you
wonder why she fakes headaches. When you do this, your killing what
attracted her to you and it damages ur sex life in the long run.
Women experience sex far
differently from us and yes they can transend sexual pleasure in ways
we men can never reach. We experience one orgasm although their are
quite a few lucky bastards that can have multiple however, to your one
she had four different kinds. (Clitoral, G-Sport, V-spot and the
Epicenter "the tip of the cervix") If a woman knows that you can help
her reach those levels this builds your sex appeal to her and she will
be more the initiator than the initiated.
Sometimes she will not be
into it but don't see this as her not wanting you bc yeah her body goes
in cycles and you don't want her to have unpleasent experiences and
link that with you and sex in her thoughts. So make sure you give her
an experience to remember and if the night ain't right, let it lie.
If it is, let HER be the
one to make that move sometime, Your job is to get her aroused and
remember making love is something you do for her not for your penis.
Start to think more of her than ur balls and you'll find them to be
more happy instead of blue more often.
| | |
|